Archive for January, 2006

Microsoft plans cheap software in Asia

January 1, 2006

Microsoft boss Bill Gates says the company will hold talks with Asian governments to offer them cheaper versions of its Windows operating system to bring computer skills to millions of poorer people.

The discussions will grow out of a project Microsoft announced to offer a version of Windows, dubbed Windows XP Starter Edition, in Malaysia and Thailand under government-sponsored programs to provide more affordable personal computers to new users.

“We will talk with other governments about whether they have a program to get very, very low-cost computers to their citizens,” Gates told a news conference during a visit to this Southeast Asian country.

“When they have a program like that, we will talk to them about which of the versions of Windows would make sense there,” Gates said.

“We’ve shown a lot of flexibility about tuning the versions to meet any government program.”

Gates would not specify any country Microsoft is targeting in such talks.

He was asked about the potential for such projects in China and India – the population jackpots in Asia where computer use is exploding.

 

 

Gates, who sits on a panel advising the Malaysian government on technology policies, held talks with Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi for about 45 minutes on improving access for technology to Malaysians.

The company and Malaysian officials signed a memorandum of understanding for Microsoft to invest 10 million ringgit ($A3.73 million) to train teachers and improve information technology in 10,000 schools over five years.

The software giant faces increasing competition in developing countries from cheaper rivals – such as those based on “open source” Linux technology – plus the continual challenge from product piracy.

Providing cheaper legitimate versions of Windows could allow Microsoft to gain some share in the lower end of the market, which is fertile ground for pirates.

But many Asian consumers will continue to use pirated software, which would still cost less, said Chin Jun Fwu, a Kuala Lumpur-based analyst with technology research group IDC Asia-Pacific.

“From the consumer’s point of view, it’s always the price that matters,” Chin said.

Malaysia and Thailand are logical choices for Microsoft’s new project because both countries have relatively high software piracy rates – a problem that also afflicts several other Asian nations such as China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines, Chin said.

A legitimate copy of Windows XP installed on personal computer in Malaysia currently costs from 320 ringgit ($A120) to 515 ringgit ($A190), retailers say.

A pirated copy can cost as little as 5 ringgit ($A2).

The scaled-down versions of Windows that Microsoft is offering have many typical Windows features.

Under a program already under way to bring computers to rural households, a personal computer installed with a Malay-language version of the XP Home edition sells for 1,147 ringgit ($A427).

Gates said that making Windows “very, very inexpensive” would benefit people who want to train on Microsoft software and eventually land higher-paying employment as software-related jobs are created in Asia.

Abdullah said he and Gates discussed Malaysia’s aim of providing more people with access to computers and cultivating homegrown specialists to create new software and technology for international markets.

Gates has already visited Australia and heads next to China.

- AP

Google sued over Internet call technology

January 1, 2006

NEW YORK – A small New York technology firm said Friday it was suing search titan Google for up to five billion dollars for patent violation in the Internet telephony software used in Google Talk.

 

Jerry Weinberger, chief executive of Rates Technology Inc. (RTI), said he was the inventor of software programming that allows telephone calls to be placed over the Internet.

 

He said 120 companies, including Lucent, Cisco, IBM, Yahoo and Microsoft, have paid RTI to use the technology for “Voice over Internet Protocol” (VoIP) calls.

 

RTI filed suit in a Long Island federal court against Google two months ago because the search engine was using the technology without authorisation, Weinberger said after the New York Post reported the lawsuit Friday.

 

“They told us to go to hell,” the RTI boss told AFP. “They are the most arrogant company in the world.”

 

Weinberger alleged that Google has abused two patented RTI software programs in Google Talk, which enables users to talk through a computer headset or to instant message each other for free.

 

He said Google could be liable for damages of up to five billion dollars in a trial, unless it settles the complaint out of court.

 

Google did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

 

But a spokesman for the company quoted by the New York Post dismissed the lawsuit as “without merit” and said Google “will defend against it vigorously”.

 

News of the lawsuit hit Google stock, which has been a stellar performer on the Nasdaq exchange this year. The share price was down 5.17 dollars at 414.98 shortly after noon in New York.

 

VoIP usage is growing fast. Microsoft and US telecoms group MCI allied this month to offer users low-cost global calling, joining a market that also includes Skype, recently purchased by eBay, and Yahoo along with Google.

Consumers enjoy falling prices

January 1, 2006

Things are getting cheap. And I mean, “things”. Things you can touch and feel. Not intangible services, but manufactured goods.

Manufactured goods have been getting cheaper, both in absolute terms and relative to services.

Look at the Consumer Prices Index, and you see that cumulatively, since it was first launched in 1996, the prices of “goods” have fallen an average 2%; while the prices of services have risen 35%.

Material matters

The most talked about example has been in textiles: since 1996, the average price of clothes has fallen 36%. This obviously reflects the fact the world has become rather good at making clothes and there’s an abundant supply.

It means that you can buy jeans for £4, about the same price as two large cappuccinos. (Of course, you can also buy jeans for £140 at Diesel if you wish, but what you are really buying there is a cheap pair of jeans, with some very expensive cachet included).

But it is not just clothes that have been falling in price: new cars are 1.5% cheaper than they were in 1996; household appliances are 24% cheaper; toys are 30% cheaper, and of course, in the audio-visual category, you’ll find things are on average now 56% cheaper than they were nine years ago.

Human cost

As we tend to earn more, and get richer each year, there has been a dramatic fall in the number of hours you need to work to afford most consumer goods. Indeed, about six hours work at the British minimum wage will probably now earn you enough to pay for a microwave oven.

Televisions for sale at Dixons

Televisions and hi-fi equipment have fallen heavily in price

The prices of services on the other hand – particularly the labour intensive services – keep up with earnings. Six hours of minimum wage work would probably not pay for a plumber to replace a washer.

Now this development has some interesting consequences: the cheaper software become, the more casual we are about how we consume them.

A piece in The Times last year reported a decline in the number of burglaries, which was put down to the fact that the thieves can no longer get a good price for the items they steal. Who wants to nick a second hand DVD player, when you can buy a new, legal one for £20?

Below, I list half a dozen other trivial examples and observations that reflect the era of “cheap goods” into which we have moved. I would welcome your emails with other examples. (We should get to at least a hundred different observations between us.)

Nothing’s for nothing

Of course, the cheap goods era has more serious consequences too: it has implications for the environment (will we demand more raw material to make things, and will we create more waste as we dispose of them?).

UK landfill site

Are cheap goods adding to the UK’s waste problem?

It has implications for the labour market (as we get more efficient at making things, we paradoxically employ fewer people in producing them, so old manual jobs tend to disappear). It has implications for companies, trying to compete and differentiate themselves.

We have barely begun to think about these consequences.

But over the next few decades, we are surely seeing in manufacturing a process that will closely emulate the trends already seen in agriculture since the industrial revolution.

Over the last few hundred years we have got much more efficient at farming; we have become more casual about our consumption of food (indeed, we probably eat too much); and we are employing fewer people on farms.

Of course, we should not exaggerate the changing terms of trade between manufactured goods and services.

Manufactured items have always fallen in price relative to services. This is not new. (It’s all down to fact that we tend to get more efficient more quickly in manufacturing than we do in services, so for example we have improved our car-making in the last 50 years far more than our skill at waiting tables in restaurants).

And we should note, that there are some services that have fallen in price too (telecoms and airline tickets come to mind).

Prices are still falling

But the pace of decline in manufactured goods prices has picked up in recent years. The arrival of China on the global scene has contributed; the use of new technology too; and improved logistics, distribution and transport have allowed the other causes to make their contribution.

And if these are the causes, manufactured deflation may not be over yet.

On clothes, for example, it’s actually getting easier for China to make and export to us, as a swathe of quotas and restrictions that have limited free trade in textiles disappeared just as the new year arrived.

Whether other consumer durables go on getting cheaper is less obvious. But, it is probably best to assume that for the time being, prices will go on going down and competition will go on getting more intense.

Good news for consumers gives plenty for business and policy-makers to think about.

You know manufactured goods are getting cheap when:

 

  • they use real terracotta dishes in disposable pre-packed meals.
  • children get spoilt at Christmas, because toys are so affordable.
  • CDs are sent out as junk mail.
  • repair shops disappear from the high street
  • it’s almost as cheap to buy a new duvet, than to dry clean an old one.
  • people drive absurdly large vehicles on city streets, as we have got better at making vehicles cheaper, and have not, evidently got better at building our streets. 

    Your comments:

    Items that have become uneconomic to repair and therefore should (perhaps) be re-classified as consumables include ink-jet printers, kettles and cameras. The growth of the platform and software business model grows apace as consoles for games, shaving systems and (again) printers tumble in price while the consumables / software remain relatively expensive.
    Carl Mather, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales

    The Saturday queue for the local tip includes people throwing away old but fully working colour TVs, as it costs more to advertise them for sale than they are worth.
    David, London, England

    Products are getting cheaper as Evan says…

    It’s cheaper to buy a new computer printer than buy replacement ink cartridges for your old one.

    You can buy a video from a supermarket for less than it costs to rent the same title.

    You get a free dvd player with your Sunday papers.

    But, it can cost £12 to pay per track and download an album from legitimate internet music sites (for which you get nothing more than a few million 1′s and 0′s transferred down the phone line) or you can go to the local filling station and pick up the real thing (including case, sleeve notes, disc and all) for £7.99.
    Andrew, Herts, UK

    I’ve always been amazed that a Muller “fruit corner” yoghurt costs 33p –same as it did in 1993.
    Andrew Stewart, Stirling, Scotland

    Interesting idea but (IMHO) it’s a bit more complicated than that coz the price a consumer pays is made up of both the cost of the goods (manufacturing cost, which is going down) & the services involved in distribution (such as the truck driver, the accounts clerk, the sales assistant, all of whom are getting paid more without any great increase in productivity). One result is that a tiny spare part (a plastic knob) for our shower unit cost a good proportion (£11) of the price of a complete unit (about £100 the last time I checked). Similar examples are commonplace – go get a trivial replacement part for something in your car, a single screw or nut say, & you’ll see what I mean. So yes, “big budget” manufactured goods are getting cheaper but very small items are actually vastly — in some cases hundreds of times — more expensive than 10 or 20 years ago (back then small spares for cars were often simply handed over free; & I bought the same plastic knob for the same shower unit about 6 years ago & paid a fiver – QED I think).
    Denis Crampton, Bracknell, UK

    You know manufactured goods are getting cheap when: It’s cheaper to go and buy a new printer than get ink cartridges for the old one
    Dom M, London

    When the cost of the extended warranty is more than the product itself!
    Phil, London

    Have you seen how expensive it is to rent a baby seat with a hire car? For a fortnight’s rental it’s as cheap to buy your own seat and then throw it away!
    Paul Eaton, Amersham, England

    I just replaced my Fridge Freezer – the old one cost £449 in 1992. The new one cost me £300 with lots of new technology – frost free, more efficient, better internal design and lighting. If you include the retail price index adjustment the price today is half of the 1992 cost.
    Lewis Lack, Newark, England

    Oh Yes. Goods are getting cheaper and cheaper. Our microwave oven suddenly stopped working. I had to pay $30 just to find out what was the problem. Suggested repair cost was around $130. We threw the old one out and bought a new one with better features for $90. Certainly at that moment I didn’t think of pollution. Only savings were in my mind.
    Latha, RockyHill, USA

    I am glad it’s not only me that has noticed this trend. Even mundane things like the weekly grocery bill have hardly changed in price over the last 10 years.

    On the other hand, there have been hefty increases in the cost of things we cannot do without, and in particular things we cannot avoid paying for. Examples of the second category include Council Tax, Tobacco Tax, Fuel Tax – this list is almost endless. Then there are the monopoly businesses, such as the Royal Mail, and things like phone line rental, largely the preserve of BT.

    What do most of these have in common? They are charged by the Government or Local Councils. It would be very interesting to recalculate the rate of inflation over the past few year EXCLUDING government taxes and charges.
    Andrew Taylor, Nottingham, UK

    The price of manufactured goods will eventually start to rise as the cost of disposing of them rises. Governments will be forced to increase VAT on certain goods to cover the high costs of disposal.

    Enjoy the era of cheaper fridges, stereos etc. It can’t continue much longer.
    Andy, Newcastle, England

    It’s now as cheap to buy a new Qualcast Panther ‘push lawnmower’ as it is to get the blades on an old one sharpened! (£30).
    Ken Brown, Dundee UK

    My double bed bought 10 months ago in Japan cost 300gbp. It will cost 450gbp to ship it to Hong Kong. Or 5gbp to dispose of here.

    Ridiculous.
    Paul, Tokyo, Japan

    Your comments about the relative cost of goods making what used to be expensive goods disposable is so true. I recently had to get my dishwasher repaired. I rang around and the estimated cost for the repair including call out charge would have been £150. I instead went and bought a new machine witha 2 year warranty for £107, saving £43 and getting the unit covered for another 2 years for free! Why would you pay for a repair when you can get new and warranty for less? The cost will come later though as the environment gets stacked up with old machines that were not cost effective to repair.
    carol allan, Lancashire

    Kelloggs are giving away DVDs on the front of cereal packets. Packaging costs more than the manufactured goods inside
    David Bond, Maidenhead, UK

    An interesting statistic, is that you can now buy a small TV set for less than half the price of the annual colour TV licence.
    Paul Lovell, London, UK

    I bought a radio for less than a pound of grapes the other day, then paid more for the batteries to go into the radio than the grapes and the radio combined
    Dan Major, London, England

    Prices of audio/visual equipment have come down, but we end up spending as much as we used to, because the quality isn’t as high. I have a 15 year old VCR, which has outlived the many newer models I’ve owned since. It’s still going strong and has never had to be repaired.

    The trouble is, so called ‘efficiency’ in manufacturing, means that rather than items being built to last, they are merely built to sell. This obviously has an adverse affect on the environment too.
    Mel, London, UK

    Great article! I think we all appreciate that goods are getting cheaper whereas services costs escalate but there isn’t much thought (or at least) commentary on the consequences. A couple of points come to mind: 1. CPI Maybe the constituents of CPI are now outdated and hence the CPI measure is seriously understating the cost of living. Most of us have more or better ‘things’ but still struggle to make ends meet because services outgoings have increased dramatically. Have two examples: One, had a new boiler fitted recently. The cost of the boiler itself was less than the last time 4 years ago (£650 compared to £750) but the labour cost had more than doubled to £800 (2 guys for less than a day’s work)! Two, got a quote to recorate from the same chap we used 3 years ago. Wanted £1500 compared to £750 last time for the same job! The paint itself cost less now than before…

    But I doubt the government would ever contemplate redefining CPI as this would likely have a huge upward impact on reported inflation hence interest rates hence house prices etc. Are we living on borrowed time where low interest rates are determined by understated inflation figures, enabling us to borrow more to be able to just survive?

    2. Sustainability of goods price deflation I wonder if we’re going to hit a hard place soon, when either (a) no matter how cheaply things can be sourced from China, they just can’t be sold any cheaper here because of logistics/labour/property/marketing costs here or (b) maximum efficiency levels are hit in China. Hence goods price deflation will start dropping out of annual inflation measures

    3. Impact on economic growth Consumers have to buy more things for companies to earn the same revenues – e.g Dixons probably sold more things this Christmas compared to last but this wasn’t reflected in sales figures because of price deflation. This means more marketing spend to encourage more unit consumption (but there is no price deflation in marketing costs) and/or lower profitabilty which will lead to restructurings (job losses), which will lead to lower consumer spending and hence lower economic growth

    I just don’t think this ‘golden age’ can last forever!
    Amrit, London

    Yes things are getting cheaper but resources are not infinite and there is no such thing as a free lunch. There are costs; more carbon pushed into the atmosphere; disposal of waste. in the short term prices may be low but will inevitably rise in the long term with the depletion of resources. P.S. I enjoy your simple economic logic!
    Chris Grace, Accra, Ghana

  • The assault on software giant Microsoft

    January 1, 2006

    The next two years will be crucial for software giant Microsoft. Under attack on numerous fronts, it could falter – or fight back to become even more dominant. In the first of two reports, we examine the challenges facing Microsoft.

    A mirror that hides a computer screen

    Look closely: the bedroom mirror hides a computer monitor

    It looks like a Star Trek gadget: nudge the stubby black stick (no wires) and a virtual keyboard glitters in red on the kitchen worktop.

    After a few taps, the shopping list is sent to an online grocer.

    Next you could video-conference with a friend to swap recipes, or watch a cooking show stored on the hard drive of the media hub in the living room.

    Upstairs, the mirror on the bedroom wall becomes a monitor, allowing you to watch a film, browse the web – or turn up the heating and open the blinds.

    Welcome to Microsoft’s wireless “M.home”, on a leafy street in London’s Ladbroke Grove.

    Microsoft is in its most vulnerable moment in history, just like IBM in the 1990s
    George Colony, Forrester

    “This is not the home of the future,” says Cynthia Crossley, who is in charge of Microsoft’s Windows operating system in the UK. “All the technology can be bought off-the-shelf and fits subtly into your home.”

    Driven by Microsoft’s Media Center software, the showcase home lends credibility to the promise of Microsoft boss Bill Gates that in a few years’ time his company will deliver a “user-centric” digital world.

    Reality check

     

    Alas, the M.home is a far cry from real life: where few computers link up to hi-fi and television, where complex software, hardware and competing media formats drive users to despair, and where setting up wireless home networks is a black art.

    MICROSOFT
    Microsoft chairman and chief software architect Bill Gates
    HQ: Redmond, Washington
    Sales: $36bn (2004)
    Profits: $8.2bn (2004)
    Staff: 57,000
    Founded: 1975
    Chairman: Bill Gates
    Chief executive: Steven Ballmer

    Security is another issue. Millions of computers running Microsoft’s Windows operating system are under constant virus attack and riddled with spyware.

    Microsoft, meanwhile, finds itself hassled by ever more competitors.

    “Microsoft is in its most vulnerable moment in history, just like IBM in the 1990s,” says George Colony, the chief executive of technology research firm Forrester.

    Vulnerable? The company whose software powers more than 90% of all the world’s personal computers?

    Linux and friends

    Microsoft may have a monopoly right now, says Mr Colony, but “protection of a monopoly is tricky”.

    And there are plenty of challengers ready to put Microsoft’s durability to the test.

    Foremost among them is the Linux operating system.

    Linus Torvalds, the originator of Linux

    Linus Torvalds wrote the original code for Linux

    Rivalling Windows, this “open source” software project is developed by an online community of volunteers, but backed by big and small corporate players (like IBM and Red Hat) who provide support and tailor the software for individual business needs.

    Linux, its champions say, is more stable and secure than anything Microsoft has ever produced.

    It is cheap – even free if you are computer-savvy enough to install and maintain it – and much more customisable, because the code that makes it tick is neither a secret nor copyrighted by a single firm.

    These days Linux is not just the software of choice for geeks; recently even the stolid bureaucrats of Bavaria’s capital Munich decided to switch all their computers to Linux.

    China, South Korea and Japan, meanwhile, have joined forces to develop an Asian flavour of Linux, to ensure they are not in thrall to Microsoft.

    Other parts of the empire are under attack too, such as the hugely profitable “Office” suite.

    Don’t want to pay for a word processor, spreadsheet, database and presentation tool? Download OpenOffice. It won’t look as nice as Office 2003, but it’s free and fully featured.

    Editing pictures? You don’t have to pay for Microsoft’s “image suite”. The open source “Gimp” is powerful, while Google’s free Picasa will meet the everyday needs of most consumers.

    The browser war

     

    Bill Gates unveiling details of the forthcoming Longhorn operating system

    Bill Gates promises great things for “the third decade of Windows”

    Microsoft’s biggest worry, though, should be the huge success of Mozilla Firefox, the open source web browser.

    Faster and more secure than Internet Explorer, it is the first browser to seriously challenge Microsoft’s dominance.

    In just nine months Firefox has chalked up 50 million downloads, although some are admittedly upgrades.

    Bill Gates is one of the people with Firefox on his computer, so I asked him for his opinion.

    “I played around with it a bit, but it’s just another browser, and IE [Microsoft's Internet Explorer] is better,” Mr Gates told me, and challenged my assertion that Firefox’s ‘market share’ is growing rapidly.

    “So much software gets downloaded all the time, but do people actually use it?” he argued.

    Apple takes a bite

    In this fast-moving technology market, Microsoft’s biggest problem may be its very size.

    iPod buyers in Los Angeles

    Will the iPod generation go on to buy Apple computers?

    “Microsoft is not an innovator or transformer right now,” says Forrester’s George Colony. Many rivals are more focused and nimble.

    Take a company like Skype with its software for free internet telephony, successfully invading the turf of Microsoft’s MSN Messenger.

    Or long-term rival Apple, whose iPod media player and iTunes music store have thrown Microsoft’s music ambitions into disarray.

    And even giants like mobile phone maker Nokia give Microsoft a run for its money, pushing their own mobile software into the pockets of millions of consumers.

    Microsoft squeezed

    “Companies are not afraid of competing with Microsoft anymore,” says Marc Benioff, the boss of salesforce.com, which offers a service over the internet which competes with Microsoft in the lucrative market for “customer relationship management” software.

    “Microsoft is a great business… but people don’t want big software applications any more,” he claims.

    It also works for consumers. Why use Microsoft if you have a broadband connection and combine Firefox with powerful web services like Google’s Gmail?

    Here is Microsoft’s problem: while rivals try to pick off its software offering one by one, new ways of writing software – for example open source – speed up the pace of innovation and threaten Microsoft’s business model.

    Bill Gates at the Berkshire Hathaway shareholders meeting

    Bill Gates wants to push Microsoft into the mobile space

    The fate of “Longhorn” is a case in point. The much-heralded successor to Windows XP is badly delayed and key components won’t be ready for launch.

    “We are working hard to get it on the market in 2006 and scale our ambitions to fit with that,” Mr Gates admits.

     

    Thus users will have to wait until 2007 for Longhorn’s revolutionary filing system, designed to help find information buried in ever larger hard drives.

    Once ready it will be deployed as part of a Longhorn service pack, says Alistair Baker, boss of Microsoft UK.

    But Apple’s brand-new “OS X Tiger” operating system offers this kind of functionality today.

    Add Microsoft’s ongoing trouble with regulators – the company is already talking to US authorities about Longhorn – and the picture of a rich but troubled company is complete.

    Forrester boss George Colony predicts that there will be “a crisis at Microsoft, where they decide their model is broken”.

    But remember Netscape, which dominated the internet – only for Microsoft to catch up.

    Bill Gates has a clear strategy. His company has very deep pockets.

    And his fightback starts now.

    Taking on software liability

    January 1, 2006

    There has been a lot of discussion about my call for software liability in a column entitled Whose fault is it anyway?, and it shows that this is an issue which needs some serious attention.Many people have taken the time to e-mail the BBC, and there has also been a lively debate on Slashdot, the technology discussion site.

    Some of the criticism was based on an assumption that I just do not understand how programs are written. But I worked as a commercial programmer for several years, and I have seen how hard it is to write bullet-proof code.

    Just because it is hard does not mean we should give up on the effort, but current licenses allow companies to pass on the risk to their customers in an unacceptable way.

    Production and consumption

    However, a few people have written to point out that there is a big difference between developers, the people actually writing the code, and the companies that employ them and distribute the final products to the market.

    I should have made that clearer – the legalese of the license comes from the distribution side, and most developers are doing their best.

    Bill Thompson
    I still believe that the current situation is unsustainable, and that we should be working harder to improve the quality of the code out there.
    Bill Thompson

    There is also a big difference between consumer software like word processors and web browsers, and the massive information systems used internally in large companies.

    The companies writing the large systems usually have contracts which mean they are liable for damages, and this increases both the cost and the reliability of the resulting programs.

    We seem to want cheap consumer software, just as we want cheap food, and the result is that we get security holes and bugs.

    Many readers commented on the difference between free/open source software and commercial software when it comes to guarantees, and criticised my use of the licence for the Firefox browser as an example.

    I was not trying to undermine Firefox, and it is clear that there is a difference between something that is given away for free and something that is paid for when it comes to fitness for purpose and performance.

    But liability for consequential damage is different from guarantees of proper working. One of the main challenges facing us is finding a licencing regime that can allow free software to flourish while still giving users some assurance that their program will not damage their system or their lives.

    Perhaps fear of being sued, the most obvious consequence of liability, isn’t the way to it, but we must do something to improve the situation.

    I do not think we should automatically exclude free/open source software from our analysis simply because it is produced by teams of programmers working for nothing, and the fact that it is given away does not, of itself, provide legal immunity.

    Watch the road

    Man typing on keyboard, Eyewire

    Doing a better job of writing code will take time and effort

    Cars are a good example here. Motor vehicles have to be safe, and there are rules and regulations governing their development and production which, by and large, keep the roads safe from exploding cars.

    It does not stop accidents caused by driver error or poor maintenance, but it does make us safer.

    And if a group of people build their own cars then they have to follow those same rules in order to be allowed to use public roads, even if they gave their cars away.

    It should be the same for software, especially in our networked world where other people’s insecure computers host spambots and other malware that can cause damage to all network users.

    It is possible to make error-free code, or at least to get a lot closer to it than we do at the moment, but it takes time and effort. Doing it will probably mean that commercially-available code is more expensive and cause major problems for free and open source software developers.

    But I still believe that the current situation is unsustainable, and that we should be working harder to improve the quality of the code out there.

    Bill Gates Says Microsoft to Explore Cheap Software with Asian Govts

    January 1, 2006

    PUTRAJAYA, Malaysia (AP)—Bill Gates said Tuesday that Microsoft will hold talks with Asian governments to offer tailored, cheaper versions of its Windows operating system geared toward bringing computer skills to millions of poorer people.

    The discussions will grow out of a project Microsoft announced last week to offer a version of Windows, dubbed Windows XP Starter Edition, in Malaysia and Thailand under government-sponsored programs to provide more affordable personal computers to new users.

    “We will talk with other governments about whether they have a program to get very, very low-cost computers to their citizens,” Gates told a news conference during a visit to this Southeast Asian country.

    “When they have a program like that, we will talk to them about which of the versions of Windows would make sense there,” Gates said. “We’ve shown a lot of flexibility about tuning the versions to meet any government program.”

    Gates would not specify any country Microsoft is targeting in such talks. He was asked about the potential for such projects in China and India—the population jackpots in Asia where computer use is exploding.

    Gates, who sits on a panel advising the Malaysian government on technology policies, held talks with Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi for about 45 minutes on improving access for technology to Malaysians.

    Hello world!

    January 1, 2006

    Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!


    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.